By Wayne Allensworth
Lindsey Graham, allegedly a senator from South Carolina but actually one of Israel’s top agents, has died. I’m not inclined to speak ill of the dead, but it’s necessary to condemn treason. Graham was a warmonger who served a foreign power and spent much more time in and on Israel than he did his home state. He even called on Israel to use nuclear weapons against Iran and called for the assassination of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The last thing on his mind was America, at least an “America” I could recognize as such.
In the meantime, the U.S. Congress — or as Pat Buchanan so eloquently put it,, Israeli occupied territory — is moving ahead to commit the most outrageous and unimaginable act of treason by practically merging the US military-industrial-intelligence complex with Israel’s. It’s astounding and shocking that this sell out is happening openly right before our eyes. Meanwhile, MAGA diehards wave their flags, and praise “our freedom” which is rapidly evaporating as the tech totalitarians tighten the noose of the surveillance state around our collective neck and U.S. sovereignty becomes a bad joke. No doubt they will honor the “sacrifice” for “our freedom” of U.S. casualties in the next war.
Two things that should be emphasized at this pivotal moment in the decline and fall of a once-great country:
First, consider all the talk about the Iranians allegedly plotting to assassinate Donald Trump and the chatter about Putin poisoning Graham. Think about this: The U.S. government has been practicing foreign policy by assassination for a long time, including murdering — “decapitating,” to use the sanitized euphemism — the Iranian leadership at the outset of Washington’s latest war of choice. If “we” go around the world murdering foreign leaders, what makes “our” leaders immune to retaliation? Washington’s hypocrisy and moral nihilism are out in the open. Yet, I believe that all the screeching about assassination plots are most likely psychological projection in the service of Ziocon/neocon propaganda, pure and simple. Recall claims that the Iranians were out to get Trump even before he was elected. It also seems likely that such claims partly convinced Trump to strike Iran, as I believe they were designed to do. Also, at the recent NATO summit in Turkey, Trump, who had seemed to be backing away from the Russo-Ukrainian war, pronounced he was ready to license Ukraine’s production of Patriot missiles. He’s supporting the Europeans in their mad war against Putin, a war “we” helped provoke. As far as Moscow assassinating Graham, that is undoubtedly a neocon fantasy designed to gin up war fervor among the rubes. Putin has been characteristically cautious, apparently genuinely trying to avoid a direct clash with NATO. That approach is wearing thin in Moscow. The Ziocon/neocon cabal wants the U.S. to be on a permanent war footing.
Second, the powers-that-be are still attempting to create the illusion of an apocalyptic war to the knife between “right” and “left” that will keep the mob invested in a corrupt political system. As Glenn Greenwald recently observed in a segment on what the Zionists in the allegedly anti-Israel Democratic Party are up to, Zionists like Rahm Emmanuel are gaslighting us by criticizing Benjamin Netanyahu, while “bipartisan” support for merging the U.S. and Israel military-intelligence complexes moves full steam ahead. That merger, of course, would lend Congress critters, including Democrats criticizing Netanyahu, cover. They won’t have to go on record and vote for more military support for Israel. Netanyahu has claimed he wants to cut back U.S. aid, and the game he’s playing is obvious. Meanwhile, Democrats like Emanuel are hoping that the unpopular Netanyahu will be replaced, putting a new face in power in Israel, one more acceptable in America and Europe.
Republicans can wink and nod at the game while they issue dire warnings about the alleged socialist/communist menace in the guise of far-left Democrats with whom they largely collude on the divide-and-conquer game. The new “Red Scare” is as disingenuous as can be. If the commies want to put a lot of us on the dole, the “libertarian” high tech totalitarians would relegate us to living on Universal Basic Income. If the socialists want the bureaucracy to regulate our lives, the tech totalitarians in such companies as Palantir want a “network” of privatized corporate control. If the socialists want to judge everyone politically, the “libertarian”/techie right would enmesh us in an AI-driven system of total control that can switch our cars off, freeze our bank accountants, and code and trace every move we make. If the socialists would assign housing as a state program, the tech totalitarians foresee a world of renters who own nothing. And make no mistake, the socialists would use the same technology, and the tech totalitarians would invoke their own “social credit” system like China. Either way, we become serfs controlled by the elites.
The overlap between the managerial wings of the system is considerable: Klaus Schwab, formerly chieftain of the Davos World Economic Forum who resembles a villain in a James Bond movie, wants us to own nothing and be happy. Peter Thiel’s Dialog group has a number of Democrats involved, and Argentina’s President Javier Milei is not only a Thiel-like “libertarian,” but also an alumnus, as is the decidedly non-libertarian Justin Trudeau of Canada, of a Davos-sponsored leadership program (See Whitney Webb’s One Nation Under Blackmail, Volume II, pg. 123; Schwab mentioned both men in a speech at the forum). Milei delivered an address to the Davos Forum in January of this year. All are members of a broad Epstein Party. All want their own version of a “Great Reset.” You may say at least the techies aren’t “woke.” Think again. Thiel is a homosexual with a “husband” who, as a transhumanist, is as committed as the woke left to a world without any boundaries or restraints on the Will to Power. Milei strongly supports Israel and Palantir was connected to Israel on Jeffery Epstein’s recommendation.
There doesn’t appear to be any viable means of breaking the power of the Epstein Party at present. I doubt that the Tucker Carlson-Marjorie Taylor Greene third party will get anywhere. The U.S. Supreme Court has removed restraints on corporate financing of politics. The result will be a further strengthening, as if it needed it, of the Epstein Party’s control over politics. Money talks and political principles and ethical constraints, as they say, walk like the BS of the old adage. “Voting harder” won’t help. So, take your pick: George Soros or Peter Thiel. Davos or Silicon Valley. Socialism or corporate socialism that socializes costs and amasses private profits for the few. Either way, we, as in you and me, lose.
“We” are not the “good guys.” There simply aren’t any “good guys” calling the shots in this country.
Please consider supporting American Remnant: A green “Donate Today” button has been added at the end of each article (see below) appearing on the website. If you value what AR is doing, please consider supporting the website financially. $5, $10, or any amount that you can afford. Regular donations would especially be appreciated. Thank you!
Chronicles contributor Wayne Allensworth is the author of The Russian Question: Nationalism, Modernization, and Post-Communist Russia, and a novel, Field of Blood. For thirty-two years, he worked as an analyst and Russia area expert in the US intelligence community.
