By Wayne Allensworth
When Bill Gates proclaimed that Artificial Intelligence (AI) would eventually replace most human workers, the demonic — no other word fits — nightmare dreams of the globalists and their techno gurus should have finally become clear to all. “Clear” as in a clear and present existential threat to humanity and the human spirit. The culmination of fallen Lucifer and his band of rebel angels’ grand scheme to destroy humanity and finally have their revenge against the Creator they resent. The Globalist Technocrats who partly compose the Managerial Elite cannot bear any restraint, any boundaries, on their power. Their power to remake the world in a way that totalitarian regimes and destructive anarchists could never have done. The nightmare of astronaut Dave Bowman’s struggle with the HAL 9000 supercomputer is to be replayed, but with HAL as the winner. Humanity as we know it, with all its foibles and “inefficient” attachments to home and family, all its joyous eccentricities, its “irrational” emotions (I would say “arational,” that is, beyond linear “logic”) like patriotism and love itself, which cannot be rationalized, is to be remade by the worst impulses the most arrogant and hubristic elements in the managerial system can come up with. Humanity and culture will be flattened out into a lowest common denominator dystopia. As usual, the wolf wears the sheep’s clothing of “diversity” and “equity.”
Relatively easy and safe transcontinental travel enabled liberal internationalism to metastasize into globalism by making the massive, rapid shifts in population that we have witnessed in my lifetime possible. Mass migration is a weapon of mass destruction of the nation state. Boundaries must come down, all of them, for the Globalist Utopia to be realized. Boundaries between nations, to be sure, but all barriers to self-realization — traditional morality, marriage, social mores, local and regional customs, even the sexes as fundamental aspects of reality, for male and female are a foundational dipole in a cosmos of necessary opposites — also must be abolished. The modernity that produced urbanized, industrialized nations will, like a demon seed, sprout into the next stage of modernism in a post-modern, post-national, and post-human form. Disorientation and madness will be the results. The rage and resentment behind the globalists’ fever dreams revel in it.
The Internet is globalism’s central nervous system, and its high-tech offshoots are the tentacles of the globalist hydra. Truth, beauty, goodness, even consciousness, spirit itself, as a basic element of reality preceding and shaping matter, are to be replaced by a digital simulacrum. The “New Soviet Man” or perfected Aryan “Superman” of the Nazis seem as obsolete in the globalist fantasy hellscape as art and literature are in a post-literate world that has dispensed with the divine and with it, sublime art. The cult of the algorithm wishes to dispense with the wellspring of human understanding that produced great art, music, and literature. In ritual, poetry, myth, symbol, metaphor, and music, man experienced the deepest truths that could not be expressed any other way. The cult of the algorithm is the steamroller of post-modernity, dispensing with that which cannot be so expressed or digitized. It is the mindset of the bureaucrat entombed in a computer; the screeching cacophony of a demonic symphony that has encased us — and we went willingly — in a cyber bubble lending its caged inhabitants an illusion of omnipotence; the Fall in the Garden repeated yet again in its most soul-destroying format. Locked in our self-made digital dungeon, we are atoms floating in a fragmented, disoriented society.
The Davos crowd made its plans plain to anyone who paid attention: As AI and robotics are slated to replace the mass of workers, the Davos Politburo plans to provide an Internet connection and Universal Basic Income to placate the restless digital-age proletariat. You will own nothing and be happy. The collapse of marriage and the family are not problems for the Masters of The Universe, but solutions. A smaller population mesmerized by its Internet fantasies and provided with enough to survive to be a gamer for another day works very well for them. They plan on living forever or at least extending their biological lives through transhumanism’s creation of cyborgs, of digitized biological entities until the singularity is reached and their consciousness can be downloaded to a supercomputer — a diabolical inversion of the Christian arch of humanity’s history. Modern capitalism had already recast the masses as cogs in a vast machine of produce and consume, its only values efficiency, productivity, and utilitarianism.
Paradoxically, the urge to self-realization, the unfettering of the self from the moral imagination, is to be achieved by a total state, or I should say, a trans-national regime, that is the culmination of the Machine Model (humans are merely “meat computers”) ethos played out in human history. Only that vast totalitarian machine could break down the barriers that restrained the Will to Power. “Ye shall be as gods” is to be the epitaph for humanity and humane culture. Unrestricted abortion, eugenics, euthanasia, “transgenderism” and the chaos unleashed by destroying traditional sexual morality will finally break the dam.
What is ahead? The technocrats tell you in their own words. It seems that modernity’s lonely crowd will have a chance to draw themselves more fully into a Matrix of fantasy, while dispensing with the messy, troublesome, and needy humans who have provided community and intimacy in the past. Here are some excerpts from a piece posted on aldomedia.com: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Dating Robots: Love, Intimacy, and the Rise of Intelligent Robotics:
The 1960s and 70s counterculture movement saw sexual liberation take center stage, and the 1990s brought forth a normalization of pleasure products through mainstream advertising. Today, we’re not just talking about toys—we’re engineering synthetic lovers designed to meet emotional and psychological needs. …
The concept of a robotic partner was once limited to speculative fiction. However, with the launch of RealDoll’s Harmony AI in 2017, fiction started becoming fact. No longer passive mannequins, these robots now express affection, humor, and conversational intelligence. Their capacity to respond to human cues with lifelike realism is the result of years of interdisciplinary collaboration across engineering, psychology, and artificial intelligence. These machines aren’t just toys — they’re designed as companions.
If that isn’t enough to convince a sensible person of a collective Dr. Frankenstein taking shape, read on. Our digital overseers have thought of everything:
The goal is realism — not just physically, but behaviorally. A realistic robot must move, gesture, and respond in a way that builds comfort, familiarity, and trust.
The digital cocoon is to be all-encompassing:
These companions are increasingly connected to your digital life. With Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cloud-based neural learning, robots can sync with your smart home system, recognize who enters your room, and adjust behavior based on contextual data. Imagine a bot that turns off the lights, lowers your stress music playlist, and starts a warm conversation after it senses your elevated cortisol levels.
Integrated virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) will soon enable immersive experiences that combine digital and physical intimacy—allowing users to feel present with avatars, whether near or far.
The article does raise the concerns — or nightmares — of normal humans. Is this “real” or the digitized equivalent of an LSD trip? Well, the technocrats have answers for that, too:
Studies suggest that people can and do form meaningful emotional attachments to machines. In Japan, men and women alike have held weddings with virtual characters. In the U.S., growing numbers of users report preferring robotic partners over human ones. This raises both exciting and concerning possibilities for the evolution of relationships.
No need to worry too much, though:
The rise of AI relationships may redefine dating entirely. Instead of swiping on apps, future daters may upload preferences into a system that builds their perfect partner. Compatibility algorithms could go beyond hobbies and height to match psychological needs, communication style, and emotional availability — on both sides of the circuit board.
We could see blended families where a bot coexists with biological children or multiple partners. The fluidity of love and the speed of technological development suggest we’re headed for an entirely new model of companionship — one that’s endlessly customizable, perpetually loyal, and morally complex.
What’s more, an atomized and disoriented Generation Z is all-too-ready to sign up for a digital date:
Acceptance of robotic companionship is growing rapidly among younger generations. Gen Z, raised on screens and avatars, often view digital intimacy as valid as physical touch. Millennials, accustomed to digital dating and teletherapy, are also open to the idea.
Older generations, by contrast, tend to perceive robotic love with caution. To them, it symbolizes disconnection and detachment. But cultural norms evolve. In two decades, robotic intimacy might be as ordinary as online dating is today.
Lest we think that sexual stereotypes — or normal human preferences — will reign, stay calm, woke technocrats can fix that as well:
Critics argue that current AI companions are built to reflect narrow ideals of beauty and behavior. Hyper-feminized designs, or overly muscular male forms, may reinforce stereotypes that are already problematic in media and society. Moreover, if AI is always agreeable and servile, it could promote unhealthy relationship dynamics where disagreement and emotional independence are absent.
Fortunately, many companies are beginning to address this by offering models with diverse body types, personality traits, and sexual orientations. The aim is not just variety, but a more inclusive and respectful evolution of the technology.
Madness reigns, especially among those who consider themselves the intellectual superiors of the rest of us. As Lucifer, the Light Bearer of arrogant intellect, rejected Heaven in favor of reigning in Hell as Satan. He would destroy Creation and make a better one than God’s. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, it does. This talk of robot “intimacy” should instantly relegate its true believers to an asylum, but in the vast asylum of post-modern America, where Truth is whatever you want it to be, it is rapidly replacing the hard-won wisdom of the ages. Who wouldn’t want to be a god or goddesses in total control — only the total control will be in the hands of the technocrats, who will monitor, evaluate, and assess your suitability as a subject of the digital dungeon constantly. In a country rapidly moving toward more chaos, any authoritarian response — I don’t care whether it’s your SOB or mine running the show — will have the ultimate temptation at hand, the levers of a “social credit” system that delves into the most intimate details of what used to be private lives.
In Hollywood, human actors might be largely replaced by AI avatars. Drama, comedy, and tragedy, artistic expressions of the human experience, will be further detached from humans themselves. Even the voices will be computer generated. Movie stars, as shallow as they could be, were at least personae attached to actual human beings. As for the great dramatists and screenwriters, they, too, will go the way of all flesh in the AI era.
Actress Justine Bateman likened the situation to an “existential threat”: “If they can do this with actors, they can do it with writers, directors, cinematographers — everyone. We’ll be replaced with Frankenstein spoonfuls of our own work.”
Indeed. It is already becoming difficult to make the most important judgement about what one sees, reads, and hears in a manipulative digital universe that can place actual images in a simulated video clip and make real people say things they never said: Is it real or not? Judging by the AI generated content I’ve seen, we can hope it is so bad, so stilted, that audiences will reject it. Audiences, that is, who came to maturity in a pre-digital age. But what of the children of today? Infants raised in a normal family learn to judge others’ emotions and intentions at close range. Close range with real people, that is. It is an essential element in laying groundwork for interacting in a real human community, for nurturing intuition that is of great importance in navigating the world.
But we are moving quickly off a cliff into an abyss that will stunt and inhibit the development of human personality. In truth, I think techno-culture — with its view of humans as troublesome commodities and human personality as something to be eradicated — is already doing that. In the technocrats’ grand design of nurturing a sheepish mass of complacent consumers, of eliminating all pain, emotional trauma, risk, and struggle, the very stuff of spiritual and personal development, we risk our humanity and the opportunity to live fulfilling lives. The dehumanizing aspects of modernity are coming to a head in a post-human post-modernity. By making ourselves gods, we can only ensure the reign of demons.
Chronicles contributor Wayne Allensworth is the author of The Russian Question: Nationalism, Modernization, and Post-Communist Russia, and a novel, Field of Blood. For thirty-two years, he worked as an analyst and Russia area expert in the US intelligence community.
Please consider supporting American Remnant: A green “Donate Today” button has been added at the end of each article (see below) appearing on the website. If you value what AR is doing, please consider supporting the website financially. $5, $10, or any amount that you can afford. Regular donations would especially be appreciated. Thank you!
